CW-2005-0007Chandigarh, ChandigarhJudgment 27 July 2005

Punjab Police Director General of Police vs State (Admn., U.T. Chandigarh)

The Supreme Court dismissed former Punjab DGP K.P.S. Gill's appeal (Crl. A. 1032/1998) and upheld his conviction under Sections 354 and 509 IPC for slapping the posterior of a woman senior IAS officer at a Chandigarh dinner party on 18 July 1988. The Sessions Judge had replaced the custodial sentence with release on probation and a Rs 50,000 fine (half to complainant), but the High Court in revision enhanced the fine to Rs 2,00,000 payable entirely to the prosecutrix plus Rs 25,000 costs — which the Supreme Court left undisturbed, noting the Rs 2 lakh lay in court deposit for disposal by the Punjab & Haryana CJ at the complainant's request (donation to a women's organisation). The Court also dismissed the complainant's appeal (Crl. A. 430/1999) seeking enhancement, noting Gill had completed probation without violation. The accused's conspiracy defence was recorded and rejected. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 27 July 2005 in Criminal Appeal No. 1032 of 1998 (with Crl.A. No. 430 of 1999), the Supreme Court of India (Coram: K.G. Balakrishnan, B.N. Srikrishna, JJ.) affirmed the conviction of the Director General of Police, Punjab Police.

Register number
CH 01 CW 0005
Case reference
Criminal Appeal No. 1032 of 1998 (with Crl.A. No. 430 of 1999) / (2005) 6 SCC 161; AIR 2005 SC 3104
Court and date
Supreme Court of India (Coram: K.G. Balakrishnan, B.N. Srikrishna, JJ.), 27 July 2005
Officer(s) at the material time
Director General of Police, Punjab Police
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“we find no merit in the appeal preferred by the accused. The appeal is dismissed accordingly.” (at para n/a)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Supreme Court of India judgment dated 27 July 2005 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“we find no merit in the appeal preferred by the accused. The appeal is dismissed accordingly.” (para n/a)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Supreme Court of India judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Supreme Court of India judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: (2005) 6 SCC 161; AIR 2005 SC 3104
Not yet re-checked.
27 Jul 2005

Order issued

Concluded
Supreme Court of India External · Binding

The Supreme Court of India dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: (2005) 6 SCC 161; AIR 2005 SC 3104
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.