CH 00 VC 0002Chandigarh23 September 2026

Excise plea withdrawn in Chandigarh liquor-recovery case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court closed a petition arising from a Punjab Excise Act liquor-recovery case against a person facing trial in Chandigarh. The court recorded the legal history of liquor recoveries under the Act and allowed withdrawal of the plea. The underlying excise prosecution continues.

Prosecution pendingV2
What this record means

This page records what the cited court records say happened. Findings belong to the court or authority that made them; this register adds none of its own. Names of private individuals are withheld unless a naming gate clears them.

How we verify →

The petition was withdrawn on 23.09.2026, leaving the underlying excise case to continue in the trial court.

What happened

The High Court recorded that the present occurrence took place on 08.07.2018 and that the matter raised the excise-law classification of liquor recoveries.

The High Court recorded that after an amendment to the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, all cases of recovery of liquor were punishable under Section 61(A), while other intoxicant cases were punishable under Section 61.

The High Court recorded that Section 61(A) was later removed from the statute book in 2013.

The High Court recorded that counsel for the petitioner stated he wished to withdraw the petition at that stage, and the court ordered accordingly and disposed of pending applications.

What the record says

“Section 61(A) was removed from the Statute Book in 2013.”

[name withheld] vs State of UT Chandigarh, CRM-M-10893-2022, order dated 23.09.2026 — read the full text

No complaining victim

Possessing or carrying liquor for personal use or sale harms no complaining victim, and the case was pursued only under excise law.

What we could not confirm

FIR number, police station, quantity of liquor and full factual narrative were not visible in the accessible excerpt; no spurious-liquor, violence or additional victim allegation appeared in the excerpt.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.