State (SPE Lokayukta) v. Madhya Pradesh Police Assistant Sub-Inspector
The Special Judge (PC Act) Sagar on 20 March 2019 convicted ASI of PS Surkhi, who demanded Rs.25,000 from complainant [name withheld] for removing his and his brother's names from an FIR and was caught red-handed taking Rs.5,000 in an SPE Lokayukta trap (Spl Case LOK/15/2016); he drew 4 years RI with Rs.10,000 fine on each of the s.7 and s.13(1)(d)/13(2) counts. On 25 April 2019 the MP High Court suspended the custodial sentence and granted bail pending appeal (CRA-2758-2019).
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment dated 20 March 2019, the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), Sagar convicted the Assistant Sub-Inspector, Police Station Surkhi, District Sagar, Madhya Pradesh Police.
- Register number
- MP 15 CW 0010
- Case reference
- Special Case No.LOK/15/2016; MP HC CRA-2758-2019 (order 23-04-2019)
- Court and date
- The Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), Sagar, 20 March 2019
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Assistant Sub-Inspector, Police Station Surkhi, District Sagar, Madhya Pradesh Police
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “Appellant stands convicted for an offence punishable under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act and has been sentenced to undergo RI for 4 years with fine of Rs.10,000/-.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 4 years RI + Rs.10,000 fine (s.7, 3 months RI default); 4 years RI + Rs.10,000 fine (s.13(1)(d)/13(2), 3 months RI default)
- Present status of the proceedings
- An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), Sagar convicted the accused police personnel on 20 March 2019. An appeal is pending; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: 4 years RI + Rs.10,000 fine (s.7, 3 months RI default); 4 years RI + Rs.10,000 fine (s.13(1)(d)/13(2), 3 months RI default)
Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2)
Appeal status
Appeal pending. Appeal text