State (SVB Gurgaon) v. Haryana Police Head Constable
Per the High Court order, Head Constable of Haryana Police (PS Taoru), prosecuted under ss.7/13 of the PC Act and ss.225/353/186 IPC for demanding Rs 15,000/month (settled at Rs 10,000/month, payable 09-12-2003) from a dumper operator and then obstructing the SVB Gurgaon raiding party (DSP) and helping SHO — from whose pocket 20 notes of Rs 500 were recovered — to bolt from the trap spot, stands convicted under ss.353 and 225 IPC with 9 months RI plus Rs 1,000 fine on each count. The appeal was admitted on 06-12-2005 and was still pending in 2013 (stay of conviction sought, dismissed from service 09-02-2006); trial-court name and exact conviction date not stated in the stay order (conviction pre-dates December 2005). SHO 's own trial outcome not traced — no row added for him.
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment in 2005, the Trial court not stated in stay order (PC Act trial; appeal Crl.A. No.2107-SB of 2005) convicted the Head Constable, Haryana Police, Police Station Taoru (Nuh district; dismissed from service 09-02-2006).
- Register number
- HR 27 CW 0001
- Case reference
- P&H HC Crl. Appeal No.2107-SB of 2005; Crl. Misc. No.9973 of 2013 (trap 09-12-2003, PS Taoru); reported in the judgment of the Special Judge (trial court; name not stated in stay order)
- Court and date
- The Trial court not stated in stay order (PC Act trial; appeal Crl.A. No.2107-SB of 2005), 2005
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Head Constable, Haryana Police, Police Station Taoru (Nuh district; dismissed from service 09-02-2006)
- Present service status
- Recorded in the cited sources as dismissed from service.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 225 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “He stands convicted for offences under Sections 353, 225 IPC and sentence to undergo RI for a period of 9 months coupled with fine of Rs.1000/-.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 9 months RI under each of ss.353 and 225 IPC
- Present status of the proceedings
- An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Trial court not stated in stay order (PC Act trial; appeal Crl.A. No.2107-SB of 2005) convicted the accused police personnel on 2005. An appeal is pending; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: 9 months RI under each of ss.353 and 225 IPC
Sections: IPC 353; IPC 225
Appeal status
Appeal pending. Appeal text