State v. Shambhu Dayal Nagar (Cr.A. No. 2/1999 MP HC; Crl. Appeal 261/2004 SC)
The Special Judge convicted ASI Shambhu Dayal Nagar of PS Malanpur for demanding Rs 5,000 (settled at Rs 3,500) from complainant [name withheld] to neither seize his rifle nor arrest him and his brother in a village assault case, caught in a trap on 21 August 1996; he drew 1 year RI each under PC Act ss.7 and 13(1)(d)/13(2). The MP High Court (Gwalior, Cr.A. 2/1999, 30 January 2003) set aside the conviction, but the Supreme Court on 2 November 2006 (Crl.A. 261/2004) restored the Special Judge's conviction and sentence on overwhelming evidence. CAVEAT: exact trial court name and conviction date not stated in the SC judgment (pre-1999).
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment in 1999, the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) (Malanpur/Bhind jurisdiction; exact court unstated in SC judgment) convicted the Shambhu Dayal Nagar (Assistant Sub-Inspector).
- Register number
- MP 30 CW 0001
- Case reference
- State v. Shambhu Dayal Nagar (Cr.A. No. 2/1999 MP HC; Crl. Appeal 261/2004 SC); reported in the judgment of the Supreme Court of India
- Court and date
- The Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) (Malanpur/Bhind jurisdiction; exact court unstated in SC judgment), 1999
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Shambhu Dayal Nagar (Assistant Sub-Inspector)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “the impugned judgment of the High Court is set aside and the judgment of the Special Judge is restored”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 1 year RI (s.7); 1 year RI + Rs 500 fine (s.13(1)(d)/13(2)), concurrent; 2 months further RI in default of fine
- Present status of the proceedings
- The conviction was affirmed in appeal.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) (Malanpur/Bhind jurisdiction; exact court unstated in SC judgment) convicted the accused police personnel on 1999. The conviction was upheld on appeal. Appeal text.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: 1 year RI (s.7); 1 year RI + Rs 500 fine (s.13(1)(d)/13(2)), concurrent; 2 months further RI in default of fine
Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d) r/w 13(2)
Appeal status
Upheld on appeal. Appeal text