State v. Haryana Police not stated (Haryana Police personnel; Personal Security Officer to the judge; in service since 2007)
Additional Sessions Judge Sudheer Parmar, Gurugram, on 7 February 2020 (reported 8 February 2020) awarded the death sentence to Haryana Police PSO [name withheld] for shooting dead the wife and son of a Gurugram Additional Sessions Judge, in Arcadia market Gurugram on 13 October 2018 following an altercation over car keys. The court relied on the accused's extra-judicial confession and the dying declaration of a Gurugram woman, rejecting the spur-of-the-moment leniency plea given his gross misuse of a security-duty position. Confirmation/appeal posture unknown.
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment dated 6 February 2020, the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram (Judge Sudheer Parmar) convicted the not stated (Haryana Police personnel; Personal Security Officer to the judge; in service since 2007), Haryana Police (PSO to Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram).
- Register number
- HR 26 CW 0004
- Case reference
- Session Case No. 82 of 2019 (CNR HRGR01-000512-2019)
- Court and date
- The Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram (Judge Sudheer Parmar), 6 February 2020
- Officer(s) at the material time
- not stated (Haryana Police personnel; Personal Security Officer to the judge; in service since 2007), Haryana Police (PSO to Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; the Arms Act, 1959
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “When a protector turns into a predator and misuses his position and utilizes his service revolver to commit a crime, his actions are proof that he is beyond reform and a threat to society at large. Thus, the accused deserves …”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: Death penalty (rarest-of-rare reasoning; subject to High Court confirmation — outcome unknown)
- Present status of the proceedings
- An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram (Judge Sudheer Parmar) convicted the accused police personnel on 6 February 2020. An appeal is pending; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: Death penalty (rarest-of-rare reasoning; subject to High Court confirmation — outcome unknown)
Sections: IPC 302; IPC 201; Arms Act 1959
Appeal status
Appeal pending. Appeal text