Trial-court conviction
t2-01-023Tiruchirappalli, Tamil NaduConvicted 10 November 2022

State (DVAC) v. Tiruchirappalli Police Inspector of Police and others

The DVAC press note (Tamil) states Inspector of Airport P.S., [name withheld] phoned complainant [name withheld] on 11.08.2009 demanding Rs.5,000 to close a case against him favourably, was trapped accepting it, and was convicted on 10.11.2022. Court discrepancy: the Tamil PDF says Special Court, [name withheld] district; the press-page link text says 'Special Judge, [name withheld]'. [name withheld] (PDF body) taken as authoritative.

Trial-court convictionV1
What this record means

This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 10 November 2022, the Special Court, Tiruchirappalli (Special Judge for PC Act cases) convicted the Inspector of Police, Airport Police Station, Tiruchirappalli City.

Register number
TN 45 CW 0012
Case reference
State (DVAC) v. Tiruchirappalli Police Inspector of Police and others; reported in the judgment of the Special Court (Prevention of Corruption Act), Tiruchirappalli
Court and date
The Special Court, Tiruchirappalli (Special Judge for PC Act cases), 10 November 2022
Officer(s) at the material time
Inspector of Police, Airport Police Station, Tiruchirappalli City
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Facts in brief
The DVAC press note (Tamil) states Inspector of Airport P.S., [name withheld] phoned complainant [name withheld] on 11.08.2009 demanding Rs.5,000 to close a case against him favourably, was trapped accepting it, and was convicted on 10.11.2022. Court discrepancy: the Tamil PDF says Special Court, [name withheld] district; the press-page link text says 'Special Judge, [name withheld]'. [name withheld] (PDF body) taken as authoritative.
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 1 year RI + Rs.10,000 fine (demand); 3 years RI + Rs.10,000 fine (acceptance); concurrent
Present status of the proceedings
No appeal is known from the cited sources.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Special Court, Tiruchirappalli (Special Judge for PC Act cases) convicted the accused police personnel on 10 November 2022. No appeal is known from the cited sources.

Sentence & charges

Sentence: 1 year RI + Rs.10,000 fine (demand); 3 years RI + Rs.10,000 fine (acceptance); concurrent

Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d)

Appeal status

No appeal known.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.