CW-2026-0096Ranga Reddy, TelanganaJudgment 18 September 2026

Ranga Reddy Man vs Investigating Officer, Saroor Nagar Police Station & Anr

The High Court recorded that it had granted a man interim protection from arrest on 21.04.2026, extended on 23.04.2026 and 27.04.2026, in an FIR registered at Saroor Nagar Police Station, and that he was nevertheless arrested on 28.04.2026 and produced before the Magistrate, who refused remand. The High Court rejected the investigating officer's apology and his explanation that he did not know of the extension, holding that he knew of the first protection order and should have verified its status, including from the court's website. The High Court held the investigating officer guilty of wilful disobedience and sentenced him to one month's imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000; the contempt case against a sub-inspector was dismissed because he had no role in the arrest. At the Public Prosecutor's request the sentence was suspended till 19.10.2026 to allow an appeal.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 18 September 2026 in Contempt Case No. 2485 of 2026, the High Court for the State of Telangana (Coram: K. Sujana, J.) recorded the conviction of the Investigating Officer (reported as an Assistant Commissioner of Police), Saroor Nagar Police Station, Telangana Police.

Register number
TG 07 CW 0005
Case reference
Contempt Case No. 2485 of 2026
Court and date
High Court for the State of Telangana (Coram: K. Sujana, J.), 18 September 2026
Officer(s) at the material time
Investigating Officer (reported as an Assistant Commissioner of Police), Saroor Nagar Police Station, Telangana Police
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
the Sections 10, 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
Finding of the Court (extract)
“This Court holds that respondent No.1 has willfully disobeyed the orders passed by this Court and is, therefore, liable to be punished for contempt.” (at para 18)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction entered by High Court. Sentence: imprisonment.
Present status of the proceedings
The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Judgment dated 18 September 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Court finding

A court has made a finding on this allegation.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“This Court holds that respondent No.1 has willfully disobeyed the orders passed by this Court and is, therefore, liable to be punished for contempt.” (para 18)

Institutional response

1
18 Sep 2026

Order issued

Concluded
High Court for the State of Telangana External · Binding

The High Court held the investigating officer guilty of contempt and sentenced him to one month's imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000, suspended till 19.10.2026.

conviction by HC (contempt).
Source: Contempt Case No. 2485 of 2026
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

2
25 Sep 2026

(Past-week sweep: record written from the order text; quote checked verbatim against the order.)

25 Sep 2026

(Official source added: Telangana High Court order in C.C. No. 2485 of 2026 dated 18.09.2026 (copy hosted by LiveLaw); quote checked verbatim, sentence of one month and Rs 2,000 fine confirmed, suspended till 19.10.2026 for appeal.)

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.