CW-2026-0087Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar IslandsJudgment 6 August 2026

The State vs Nicobar Police Police Constable

The High Court convicted a serving police constable by its judgment dated 23.04.2026, reversing the Sessions Judge's acquittal dated 24.04.2024 in Sessions Case No. 32 of 2015. The High Court held that intimacy was secured on a false promise of marriage and that the complainant lady constable was coerced into abortions. The High Court imposed the minimum seven-year rigorous imprisonment plus fine for the sexual offence and a concurrent one-year term plus fine for the second offence. The High Court directed that ninety percent of any fine realized be disbursed to the victim as compensation.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 6 August 2026 in CRA (DB) 6 of 2024 with CRA (DB) 4 of 2024, the High Court at Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Port Blair (Coram: Arijit Banerjee, Apurba Sinha Ray, JJ.) recorded the conviction of the Police Constable, PS Aberdeen, Andaman and Nicobar Police.

Register number
AN 01 CW 0004
Case reference
CRA (DB) 6 of 2024 with CRA (DB) 4 of 2024
Court and date
High Court at Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Port Blair (Coram: Arijit Banerjee, Apurba Sinha Ray, JJ.), 6 August 2026
Officer(s) at the material time
Police Constable, PS Aberdeen, Andaman and Nicobar Police
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Ninety percent (90%) of the fine amount, if realized, shall be disbursed to the victim as compensation.” (at para sentence order)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction entered by High Court. Sentence: imprisonment.
Present status of the proceedings
The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Judgment dated 6 August 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Ninety percent (90%) of the fine amount, if realized, shall be disbursed to the victim as compensation.” (para sentence order)

Institutional response

1
6 Aug 2026

Order issued

Concluded
High Court at Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Port Blair External · Binding

The High Court at Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Port Blair recorded adverse findings against police personnel.

conviction by hc.
Source: CRA (DB) 6 of 2024 with CRA (DB) 4 of 2024
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
24 Sep 2026

(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.