Order issued
ConcludedThe High Court at Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Port Blair recorded adverse findings against police personnel.
The High Court convicted a serving police constable by its judgment dated 23.04.2026, reversing the Sessions Judge's acquittal dated 24.04.2024 in Sessions Case No. 32 of 2015. The High Court held that intimacy was secured on a false promise of marriage and that the complainant lady constable was coerced into abortions. The High Court imposed the minimum seven-year rigorous imprisonment plus fine for the sexual offence and a concurrent one-year term plus fine for the second offence. The High Court directed that ninety percent of any fine realized be disbursed to the victim as compensation.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 6 August 2026 in CRA (DB) 6 of 2024 with CRA (DB) 4 of 2024, the High Court at Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Port Blair (Coram: Arijit Banerjee, Apurba Sinha Ray, JJ.) recorded the conviction of the Police Constable, PS Aberdeen, Andaman and Nicobar Police.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Judgment dated 6 August 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“Ninety percent (90%) of the fine amount, if realized, shall be disbursed to the victim as compensation.” (para sentence order)
The High Court at Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Port Blair recorded adverse findings against police personnel.
(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.