CW-2026-0071Mumbai, MaharashtraJudgment 6 April 2026

Mumbai Man And Ors vs Central Bureau Of Investigation And Ors

The High Court upheld the trial court's order directing framing of additional charges under Sections 302 and 295-A of the IPC against railway police personnel for the custodial death of a detainee picked up for a robbery inquiry. The High Court held that there was sufficient material against the accused police personnel. The High Court held that adverse inference was permissible against the police. The High Court sent the matter back for framing of charges and trial.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 6 April 2026 in CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4451 OF 2022 with CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4104 OF 2022, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Coram: A. S. Gadkari, Shyam C. Chandak, JJ.) adjudicated the matter concerning 5 police personnel, namely: Senior Police Inspector, Wadala Railway Police Station; Assistant Police Inspector, Wadala Railway Police Station; Police Sub-Inspector, Wadala Railway Police Station; Head Constable, Wadala Railway Police Station; Police Constable, Wadala Railway Police Station.

Register number
MH 01 CW 0051
Case reference
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4451 OF 2022 with CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4104 OF 2022
Court and date
High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Coram: A. S. Gadkari, Shyam C. Chandak, JJ.), 6 April 2026
Officer(s) at the material time
Senior Police Inspector, Wadala Railway Police Station; Assistant Police Inspector, Wadala Railway Police Station; Police Sub-Inspector, Wadala Railway Police Station; Head Constable, Wadala Railway Police Station; Police Constable, Wadala Railway Police Station
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Sections 302 and 295-A of the IPC
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Therefore, adverse inference is permissible against the police whomsoever he/she may be.” (at para para 13)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding.
Present status of the proceedings
The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Judgment dated 6 April 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Therefore, adverse inference is permissible against the police whomsoever he/she may be.” (para para 13)

Institutional response

1
6 Apr 2026

Order issued

Concluded
High Court of Judicature at Bombay External · Binding

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay recorded adverse findings against police personnel.

adverse finding compensation.
Source: CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4451 OF 2022 with CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4104 OF 2022
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
24 Sep 2026

(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.