CW-2026-0058Nalanda, BiharJudgment Date not stated

Katauna Resident and Anr. vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

The Patna High Court quashed District Magistrate orders imposing Section 3(3) Bihar Crime Control Act, 2024 restrictions on two Nalanda men, which required thrice-weekly attendance at Silao police station 40 km from home. The court held the orders were passed without subjective satisfaction or verification beyond an unverified police sanha, and that the SP Nalanda, the SDPO and the SHO police station had acted in haste in ignorance of the law, apparently to keep the petitioners out of the Assembly Election. It directed the State to pay each petitioner 1,00,000 compensation plus Rs 10,000 litigation costs within one month, recoverable from the erring officials after hearing. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated Date not stated in Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3363 of 2025, the Patna High Court (Coram: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Sunil Dutta Mishra, JJ.) returned findings adverse to 3 police personnel, namely: Superintendent of Police, Nalanda; Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Rajgir, Nalanda; Station House Officer, Giriyak Police Station, Nalanda, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).

Register number
BR 21 CW 0001
Case reference
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3363 of 2025
Court and date
Patna High Court (Coram: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Sunil Dutta Mishra, JJ.), Date not stated
Officer(s) at the material time
Superintendent of Police, Nalanda; Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Rajgir, Nalanda; Station House Officer, Giriyak Police Station, Nalanda
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 3(3) of the Bihar Crime Control Act, 2024
Finding of the Court (extract)
“We are constrained to observe that even the SP, Nalanda, the SDPO, Nalanda and the SHO, Giriyak Police Station, all have acted in haste without verification of the allegations made in the Sanha and they, being police officers, have shown …” (at para 39)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Judgment dated Date not stated. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“We are constrained to observe that even the SP, Nalanda, the SDPO, Nalanda and the SHO, Giriyak Police Station, all have acted in haste without verification of the allegations made in the Sanha and they, being police officers, have shown …” (para 39)

Institutional response

1
11 Sep 2026

Order issued

Concluded
Patna High Court External · Binding

The Patna High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 200,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3363 of 2025
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.