Babuwatch A Data Libertarian Project
CW-2026-0056East Godavari, Andhra PradeshJudgment 31 August 2026

Mortha Boy v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

remove/replace final sentence; police version is recorded at para 5 (Aadhar blur / 2006 impression). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →
Detailed record

Report card

By judgment dated 31 August 2026 in Writ Petition No. 24721 of 2026, the Andhra Pradesh High Court (Coram: Ninala Jayasurya, T.C.D. Sekhar, JJ.) adjudicated the matter concerning the SHO, Samisragudem Police Station, East Godavari District.

Register number
AP 39 CW 0043
Case reference
Writ Petition No. 24721 of 2026
Court and date
Andhra Pradesh High Court (Coram: Ninala Jayasurya, T.C.D. Sekhar, JJ.), 31 August 2026
Officer(s) at the material time
SHO, Samisragudem Police Station, East Godavari District
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 331(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Section 305-A of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; the JJ Act, 2015; Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“This Court is of the considered opinion that it is a fit case to impose costs. Therefore, respondent No.4/SHO, Samisragudem Police Station, East Godavari District, shall personally pay costs of Rs.10,000/- to the A.P.High Court Legal Services Committee, Amaravati, within …” (at para para 8)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding.
Present status of the proceedings
The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Current position

Judgment dated 31 August 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Evidence position

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

Attributed to the court

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“This Court is of the considered opinion that it is a fit case to impose costs. Therefore, respondent No.4/SHO, Samisragudem Police Station, East Godavari District, shall personally pay costs of Rs.10,000/- to the A.P.High Court Legal Services Committee, Amaravati, within …” (para para 8)
Separate from verification

Institutional response

1
31 Aug 2026

Order issued

Concluded
Andhra Pradesh High Court External · Binding

The Andhra Pradesh High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered compensation in an amount stated in the judgment.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: Writ Petition No. 24721 of 2026
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.