Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Allahabad High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 477
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2026-0041Pilibhit, Uttar PradeshJudgment 27 July 2026
Bisalpur Police Constable vs State of U.P.
Change closing sentence to record that the appellant's defence of denial and plea of unsoundness of mind were recorded and rejected (paras 17-18). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 27 July 2026 in Criminal Appeal No. 2564 of 1985, the Allahabad High Court (Coram: Santosh Rai, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Constable, Posted at Bareilly; offence at Bisalpur, Pilibhit, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 35,000.
- Register number
- UP 26 CW 0004
- Case reference
- Criminal Appeal No. 2564 of 1985 / 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 477
- Court and date
- Allahabad High Court (Coram: Santosh Rai, J.), 27 July 2026
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable, Posted at Bareilly; offence at Bisalpur, Pilibhit
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “The conviction of the appellant, [name withheld] under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, as recorded by the Trial Court in S.T. No. 319 of 1984, is hereby affirmed.” (at para 25(i))
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 4 years. Compensation: Rs 35,000.
- Present status of the proceedings
- The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
Judgment dated 27 July 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“The conviction of the appellant, [name withheld] under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, as recorded by the Trial Court in S.T. No. 319 of 1984, is hereby affirmed.” (para 25(i))
Separate from verification
Institutional response
27 Jul 2026
Order issued
ConcludedThe Allahabad High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 477
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.