Order issued
ConcludedThe Allahabad High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 1,000,000.
The judgment of the Allahabad High Court records the following account. An Asiwan man was arrested on 27 January 2026 in Case Crime 244/2024 though the arrest memo cited only the case number without specific grounds, and was remanded on 28 January 2026. The court found the arrest violated Article 22(1) under Mihir Rajesh Shah and the remand based on it was also illegal, ordering forthwith release after 3+ months in custody. It imposed Rs 10 lakh exemplary costs on the State payable within 4 weeks, with liberty to recover from responsible officials. On 22 June 2026 the Supreme Court stayed payment of the compensation on the State's quantum-only appeal, when the State informed the court the SHO had been suspended.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 29 April 2026 in Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 137/2026, the Allahabad High Court (Coram: Abdul Moin, Pramod Kumar Srivastava, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the Station House Officer, Police Station Asiwan, Unnao, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 10 lakh (Rs 10,00,000).
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Judgment dated 29 April 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“Para 14 (operative, contiguous): 'A writ of habeas corpus is issued declaring the arrest of the petitioner as illegal. The remand order dated 28.1.2026 being consequential to the illegal arrest is also set aside.' Para 15 (contiguous): 'Further, considering the …” (para 14)
The Allahabad High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 1,000,000.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.