2 May 2025
Order issued
ConcludedThe High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi recorded adverse findings against police personnel.
disciplinary upheld.
Source: W.P.(S) No. 2580 of 2017
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2025-0070Hazaribagh, JharkhandJudgment 2 May 2025
Hazaribagh Police Armed police personnel vs The State Of Jharkhand
The High Court held that the armed-police staffer declined assigned duty on 04.01.2005 and stayed away, with four prior penalties for overstay and absence on record. The High Court held that the case was one of refusal of duty rather than overstay of sanctioned leave. The High Court held that the delayed memorial under the Police Manual gave no ground to reopen the penalty. The High Court dismissed the writ petition.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 2 May 2025 in W.P.(S) No. 2580 of 2017, the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi (Coram: Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Armed police personnel, JAP-7, Hazaribagh.
- Register number
- JH 02 CW 0004
- Case reference
- W.P.(S) No. 2580 of 2017
- Court and date
- High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi (Coram: Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.), 2 May 2025
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Armed police personnel, JAP-7, Hazaribagh
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Not stated in the cited sources
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed.” (at para final paragraph)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: imprisonment.
- Present status of the proceedings
- The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
Judgment dated 2 May 2025. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed.” (para final paragraph)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
24 Sep 2026
(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.