9 Sep 2025
Order issued
ConcludedThe High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi recorded adverse findings against police personnel.
disciplinary upheld.
Source: W.P.(S) No. 1637 of 2018
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2025-0068JharkhandJudgment 9 September 2025
Jharkhand Police Not stated; uniformed member vs The State Of Jharkhand
The High Court held that the uniformed staffer had joined a coordinated mass leave and incited colleagues while holding weaponry and shouting slogans. The High Court held that the compulsory retirement imposed after the departmental enquiry was supported by the record. The High Court held that an earlier writ (WPS No. 4872 of 2008) had already left the penalty undisturbed. The High Court dismissed the writ application.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 9 September 2025 in W.P.(S) No. 1637 of 2018, the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi (Coram: Deepak Roshan, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Not stated; uniformed member, State police.
- Register number
- JH 00 CW 0005
- Case reference
- W.P.(S) No. 1637 of 2018
- Court and date
- High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi (Coram: Deepak Roshan, J.), 9 September 2025
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Not stated; uniformed member, State police
- Present service status
- Recorded in the cited sources as compulsorily retired.
- Provisions invoked
- Not stated in the cited sources
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “instant application stands dismissed” (at para final paragraph)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: imprisonment.
- Present status of the proceedings
- The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
Judgment dated 9 September 2025. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“instant application stands dismissed” (para final paragraph)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
24 Sep 2026
(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.