Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Chhattisgarh High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: 2025:CGHC:34873-DB
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2025-0032Janjgir-Champa, ChhattisgarhJudgment 22 July 2025
Mulmula Police Station House Officer and others vs State of Chhattisgarh (Mulmula Police personnel vs State of Chhattisgarh)
The judgment of the Chhattisgarh High Court records the following account. Replace 'merciless beating' with attributed wording; replace tagline with defence (mob assault, expert doubt, para 9+) and its rejection. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 22 July 2025 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 611/2019, 705/2019, 681/2019, 609/2019 with Acquittal Appeal No. 676/2019, the Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: Sanjay K. Agrawal, Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ.) affirmed the conviction of 4 police personnel, namely: Station House Officer, Mulmula Police Station, Janjgir-Champa; Constable, Mulmula Police Station, Janjgir-Champa; Constable, Mulmula Police Station, Janjgir-Champa; Sainik, Mulmula Police Station, Janjgir-Champa.
- Register number
- CG 11 CW 0004
- Case reference
- Criminal Appeal Nos. 611/2019, 705/2019, 681/2019, 609/2019 with Acquittal Appeal No. 676/2019 / 2025:CGHC:34873-DB
- Court and date
- Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: Sanjay K. Agrawal, Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ.), 22 July 2025
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Station House Officer, Mulmula Police Station, Janjgir-Champa; Constable, Mulmula Police Station, Janjgir-Champa; Constable, Mulmula Police Station, Janjgir-Champa; Sainik, Mulmula Police Station, Janjgir-Champa
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “उन्हें दिया गया आजीवन कारावास का दंडादेश अपास्त किया जाता है और इस परिवर्तित दोषसिद्धि के लिए उन्हें दस वर्ष के कठोर कारावास से दंडादिष्ट किया जाता है।” (at para 35)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment; maximum substantive term of 10 years.
- Present status of the proceedings
- The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
Judgment dated 22 July 2025. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“उन्हें दिया गया आजीवन कारावास का दंडादेश अपास्त किया जाता है और इस परिवर्तित दोषसिद्धि के लिए उन्हें दस वर्ष के कठोर कारावास से दंडादिष्ट किया जाता है।” (para 35)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
22 Jul 2025
Order issued
ConcludedThe Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: 2025:CGHC:34873-DB
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.