Order issued
ConcludedThe Andhra Pradesh High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 10,000.
remove/replace final sentence; police claim (detenu attended on notice) recorded and disbelieved; SHO examined in court. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 10 November 2025 in W.P. No. 25601 of 2024, the Andhra Pradesh High Court (Coram: R. Raghunandan Rao, T.C.D. Sekhar, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the Inspector of Police (Station House Officer), NTR Police Station (Cyber Crime), Vijayawada, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 10,000.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Judgment dated 10 November 2025. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“The fundamental rights of the detenue, guaranteed under Article 21 and Article 22 of the Constitution of India, protecting him against arbitrary detention and assuring him of being produced before a magistrate, within 24 hours of such detention have clearly …” (para 20)
The Andhra Pradesh High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 10,000.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.