Babuwatch A Data Libertarian Project
CW-2024-0040Kondagaon, ChhattisgarhJudgment 16 July 2024

Chindali Man v. State of Chhattisgarh

The judgment of the Chhattisgarh High Court records the following account. Replace bond sentence with: 'without the prior show-cause required by s.107(1) CrPC (para 15)'; add State contention (para 7: arrest on suspicion, bond default, denial of illegality). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →
Detailed record

Report card

By judgment dated 16 July 2024 in WPCR No. 322 of 2023, the Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: Ramesh Sinha, Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the SHO, PS Bade Dongar, Kondagaon, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 25,000.

Register number
CG 27 CW 0001
Case reference
WPCR No. 322 of 2023
Court and date
Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: Ramesh Sinha, Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, JJ.), 16 July 2024
Officer(s) at the material time
SHO, PS Bade Dongar, Kondagaon
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Section 116(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Finding of the Court (extract)
“We deem it fit to award compensation of Rs.25,000/- to the petitioner, and same shall be payable by the State Government to the petitioner within a period of 30 days from today.” (at para 15)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 25,000.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Current position

The Chhattisgarh High Court judgment dated 16 July 2024 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Evidence position

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

Attributed to the court

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“We deem it fit to award compensation of Rs.25,000/- to the petitioner, and same shall be payable by the State Government to the petitioner within a period of 30 days from today.” (para 15)
Separate from verification

Institutional response

1
16 Jul 2024

Order issued

Concluded
Chhattisgarh High Court External · Binding

The Chhattisgarh High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 25,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: WPCR No. 322 of 2023
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.