remove/replace final sentence; respondents' counters (denial + police-department ownership claim) are recorded and rejected for want of material. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 4 April 2024 in Writ Petition No. 19858 of 2013, the Andhra Pradesh High Court (Coram: K. Manmadha Rao, J.) returned findings adverse to the Inspector, Piduguralla Police Station, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 2.8 lakh (Rs 2,75,000).
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment dated 4 April 2024 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, it is observed that, the respondents without following due process of law, have high handedly demolished the houses of the petitioners is declared as illegal and arbitrary.” (para 12)
The Andhra Pradesh High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 275,000.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.
