Order issued
ConcludedThe Allahabad High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 35,000.
The Allahabad High Court held that Sudarshan Yadav and another, challaned by the PS Ramkola Sub-Inspector under Sections 151, 107 and 116 CrPC over a land dispute and jailed by the Deputy District Magistrate Kaptanganj on 10 February 2024, stayed behind bars till 2 March 2024 in violation of the legal provisions, with the State counter affidavit offering no justification. Following its Ramesh Chand Gupta ruling, the Court allowed the writ and quashed the show-cause order and Case No. 4082 of 2024. It ordered the State to pay Rs 25,000 costs plus Rs 10,000 litigation costs within six weeks, with a compliance report to the Registrar. No individual officer was named and no recovery was ordered. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 30 May 2024 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 6349 of 2024, the Allahabad High Court (Coram: Siddharth, Surendra Singh-I, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the Sub-Inspector, PS Ramkola, Kushinagar, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 35,000.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
The Allahabad High Court judgment dated 30 May 2024 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“In the counter affidavit, no justification has been made as to why the petitioners were kept behind bars and were only released on 02.03.2024 in violation of legal provisions noted above.” (para 6)
The Allahabad High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 35,000.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.