Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Uttarakhand High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: (2023) 08 UK CK 0135
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2023-0024Haridwar, UttarakhandJudgment 23 August 2023
Uttarakhand Police Constable vs State of Uttarakhand
The judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court records the following account. On 25 July 2003 Constable and fellow constables were escorting accused [name withheld] back after production before the Special Judge (Gangster Act) when he escaped from their custody at the railway station. The trial court convicted [name withheld] under Section 223 IPC in August 2018 with a Rs 2,000 fine, acquitting him under Section 224, and the I Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar dismissed his appeal in December 2022. In criminal revision the Uttarakhand High Court left the findings of the courts below untouched but, noting 20-year pendency, a clean record and probation granted to two co-accused, altered the sentence to release on probation of good conduct for six months on a Rs 30,000 bond. The court directed that Section 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 shall apply. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 23 August 2023 in Criminal Revision No. 793 of 2022, the Uttarakhand High Court (Coram: Alok Kumar Verma, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Constable, Uttarakhand Police escort party (Haridwar courts).
- Register number
- UK 08 CW 0005
- Case reference
- Criminal Revision No. 793 of 2022 / (2023) 08 UK CK 0135
- Court and date
- Uttarakhand High Court (Coram: Alok Kumar Verma, J.), 23 August 2023
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable, Uttarakhand Police escort party (Haridwar courts)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 223 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “Revisionist was acquitted of the charge framed under Section 224 IPC, however, he was convicted under Section 223 IPC.” (at para 8)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Uttarakhand High Court judgment dated 23 August 2023 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“Revisionist was acquitted of the charge framed under Section 224 IPC, however, he was convicted under Section 223 IPC.” (para 8)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
23 Aug 2023
Order issued
ConcludedThe Uttarakhand High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: (2023) 08 UK CK 0135
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.