CW-2023-0023Madurai, Tamil NaduJudgment 18 August 2023

M. Jeya vs The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department and Others

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court held the State liable for the custodial torture and death of 17-year-old a 17-year-old boy, who was detained by S.S. Colony police in January 2019, assaulted extensively, and succumbed to internal injuries on 24.01.2019. Justice P. Dhanabal held that the record prima facie established that the deceased died while in police custody as a direct consequence of assault. Invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and applying principles from motor accident claims (multiplier method), the Court enhanced the compensation to Rs 25,00,000 with 6% interest per annum, deducting the interim relief of Rs 5 lakh already paid. The Court directed that recovery of the compensation from delinquent police officials would abide by the result of the pending criminal trial.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 18 August 2023 in W.P.(MD) No. 5259 of 2021, the Madras High Court (Coram: P. Dhanabal, J., J.) returned findings adverse to 3 police personnel, namely: Inspector of Police, S.S. Colony Police Station; Sub-Inspector of Police, S.S. Colony Police Station; Police Constable, S.S. Colony Police Station, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 25 lakh (Rs 25,00,000).

Register number
TN 57 CW 0022
Case reference
W.P.(MD) No. 5259 of 2021 / 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 256
Court and date
Madras High Court (Coram: P. Dhanabal, J., J.), 18 August 2023
Officer(s) at the material time
Inspector of Police, S.S. Colony Police Station; Sub-Inspector of Police, S.S. Colony Police Station; Police Constable, S.S. Colony Police Station
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“It prima facie establishes the fact that the deceased died only while he was in custody of the police. Therefore, this Court can very well invoke the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to award compensation for …” (at para 10)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 25 lakh (Rs 25,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Madras High Court judgment dated 18 August 2023 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“It prima facie establishes the fact that the deceased died only while he was in custody of the police. Therefore, this Court can very well invoke the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to award compensation for …” (para 10)

Institutional response

1
18 Aug 2023

Order issued

Concluded
Madras High Court External · Binding

The Madras High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 2,500,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 256
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.