CW-2023-0005Rayagada, OdishaJudgment 15 March 2023

Chandrapur Man vs State Of Odisha And Others

The judgment of the Orissa High Court records the following account. Kandha tribal man a Chandrapur man, collecting firewood, was caught by CRPF personnel during combing operations near Gudari-Chandrapur, brought to the Chandrapur camp and mercilessly beaten, dying on 03-06-2010. The Orissa High Court (Chief Justice's bench) rejected the exhaustion-after-long-walk story, relying on post-mortem injuries, the failure to explain custody injuries, and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 22 first by the CRPF and then the police. Holding both jointly liable for torturing him to death in custody after labelling him a Maoist, it awarded Rs 10 lakh total (Rs 5 lakh each by CRPF and Odisha State Police) within eight weeks (6% interest on delay). It also urged inquiry against government doctors who gave a questionable medical report. (Force recorded as state_police; liability joint with CRPF.). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 15 March 2023 in W.P.(C) No. 13508 of 2010, the Orissa High Court (Coram: S. Muralidhar, M.S. Raman, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the Police personnel, CRPF Camp Rayagada / Chandrapur Police Station, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 10 lakh (Rs 10,00,000).

Register number
OD 18 CW 0001
Case reference
W.P.(C) No. 13508 of 2010 / 2023 LiveLaw (Ori) 38
Court and date
Orissa High Court (Coram: S. Muralidhar, M.S. Raman, JJ.), 15 March 2023
Officer(s) at the material time
Police personnel, CRPF Camp Rayagada / Chandrapur Police Station
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 14 of the Constitution of India; Article 21 of the Constitution of India; Article 22 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“It is not a mere coincidence that the deceased tribal person who was tortured to death while in custody after being labelled a maoist with not even an iota of evidence belonged to the poorer sections of the society. He …” (at para 21)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 10 lakh (Rs 10,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Orissa High Court judgment dated 15 March 2023 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“It is not a mere coincidence that the deceased tribal person who was tortured to death while in custody after being labelled a maoist with not even an iota of evidence belonged to the poorer sections of the society. He …” (para 21)

Institutional response

1
15 Mar 2023

Order issued

Concluded
Orissa High Court External · Binding

The Orissa High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 1,000,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: 2023 LiveLaw (Ori) 38
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

2
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

25 Sep 2026

(Audit fix: duplicate record CW-2023-0038 (same court, case number and judgment date) merged into this record; its sources are kept here and its URL redirects here.)

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.