15 Jun 2022
Order issued
ConcludedThe Karnataka High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: W.A. No. 5651 of 2017 with connected writ petitions
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2022-0010Mysuru, KarnatakaJudgment 15 June 2022
CISF Constable and others v. Union of India & Ors.
add: appellants were acquitted in the criminal trial but the Division Bench held (para 23) criminal acquittal does not vitiate the disciplinary finding of misconduct; date range of incidents per complaint is March-June 2015, not only May-June. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 15 June 2022 in W.A. No. 5651 of 2017 with connected writ petitions, the Karnataka High Court (Coram: Alok Aradhe, J.M. Khazi, JJ.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against 8 police personnel, namely: Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru.
- Register number
- KA 09 CW 0004
- Case reference
- W.A. No. 5651 of 2017 with connected writ petitions
- Court and date
- Karnataka High Court (Coram: Alok Aradhe, J.M. Khazi, JJ.), 15 June 2022
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru; Constable, CISF unit, BRBNMPL, Mysuru
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Not stated in the cited sources
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “In view of preceding analysis, we do not find any merit in this appeal, the same fails and is hereby dismissed.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Karnataka High Court judgment dated 15 June 2022 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“In view of preceding analysis, we do not find any merit in this appeal, the same fails and is hereby dismissed.”
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.