CW-2021-0015Munger, BiharJudgment 7 April 2021

Munger Man vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

The Patna High Court awarded Rs 10,00,000 compensation to the father of 18-year-old a Munger man, an unarmed bystander killed in police firing on a Durga idol immersion procession at Munger on 26-10-2020. The court held the State strictly liable for safeguarding life, noting the petitioner's son was uninvolved in any violence and the probe had languished with the alleged firing arms never examined. It continued court-monitored CID investigation and left private-law remedies open; the Supreme Court dismissed the State's SLP on 04-06-2021, making the award final. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 7 April 2021 in Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 68 of 2021, the Patna High Court (Coram: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Superintendent of Police, Munger; Various, Munger Police (immersion duty), and directed payment of compensation of Rs 10 lakh (Rs 10,00,000).

Register number
BR 08 CW 0002
Case reference
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 68 of 2021 / AIRONLINE 2021 PAT 267
Court and date
Patna High Court (Coram: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.), 7 April 2021
Officer(s) at the material time
Superintendent of Police, Munger; Various, Munger Police (immersion duty)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 21 of the Constitution of India; Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“In the present case, there is no allegation that the petitioner's son was involved in any act of violence. Thus, in the light of the aforementioned discussions, this Court directs the State respondents to pay a sum of Rs.10 laks …” (at para n/a)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 10 lakh (Rs 10,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Patna High Court judgment dated 7 April 2021 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Protest policingPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“In the present case, there is no allegation that the petitioner's son was involved in any act of violence. Thus, in the light of the aforementioned discussions, this Court directs the State respondents to pay a sum of Rs.10 laks …” (para n/a)

Institutional response

1
7 Apr 2021

Order issued

Concluded
Patna High Court External · Binding

The Patna High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 1,000,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: AIRONLINE 2021 PAT 267
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.