Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Telangana High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: Crl.A. No. 1507 of 2009
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2018-0030Hyderabad, TelanganaJudgment 12 December 2018
Secunderabad Police Sub-Inspector of Police vs The State of A.P. thru ACB, City Range-I
The Telangana High Court dismissed the appeal of Sub-Inspector of Karkhana Police Station, Secunderabad and confirmed his conviction by the Principal Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Hyderabad dated 15.10.2009 in C.C. No. 18 of 2005. The Court found he demanded Rs 1,000 from complainant [name withheld] for issuing a police certificate for lost LLB and transfer certificates, and was caught in an ACB trap on 25-02-2004 (Cr. No. 6/RCT-CR1/2004) with tainted currency recovered from him. Holding guilt proved beyond reasonable doubt, it confirmed one year rigorous imprisonment plus Rs 1,000 fine (one month in default) under each of Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 12 December 2018 in Crl.A. No. 1507 of 2009, the Telangana High Court (Coram: T. Rajani, J., J.) affirmed the conviction of the Sub-Inspector of Police, Karkhana Police Station, Secunderabad.
- Register number
- TG 14 CW 0006
- Case reference
- Crl.A. No. 1507 of 2009
- Court and date
- Telangana High Court (Coram: T. Rajani, J., J.), 12 December 2018
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Sub-Inspector of Police, Karkhana Police Station, Secunderabad
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “this court holds that the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubt and hence, the judgment of the court below needs no interference.” (at para 18)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 1.0 years.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Telangana High Court judgment dated 12 December 2018 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“this court holds that the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubt and hence, the judgment of the court below needs no interference.” (para 18)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
12 Dec 2018
Order issued
ConcludedThe Telangana High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: Crl.A. No. 1507 of 2009
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.