15 May 2018
Order issued
ConcludedThe Rajasthan High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: S.B. Civil Writs No. 10453/2018
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2018-0023Sikar, RajasthanJudgment 15 May 2018
Laxmangarh Police Constable No. 728, C-Company vs State of Rajasthan and Others
The judgment of the Rajasthan High Court records the following account. Constable of the 11th Battalion RAC (IR) was charge-sheeted in March 2017 for securing appointment on 2 April 1995 with a forged Class-8 transfer certificate and drawing salary since, causing loss to the exchequer. The court recorded that he was given documents, reminders and a personal hearing but showed total indifference and produced nothing to prove the certificate genuine. The disciplinary authority dismissed him in December 2017 and the appellate authority rejected his appeal in March 2018 after Rule 30 compliance. The court found no irregularity or illegality in either order and dismissed the writ for lack of merit. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 15 May 2018 in S.B. Civil Writs No. 10453/2018, the Rajasthan High Court (Coram: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Constable No. 728, C-Company, 11th Battalion RAC (IR), Vazirabad.
- Register number
- RJ 23 CW 0001
- Case reference
- S.B. Civil Writs No. 10453/2018
- Court and date
- Rajasthan High Court (Coram: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J.), 15 May 2018
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable No. 728, C-Company, 11th Battalion RAC (IR), Vazirabad
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958; Rule 30 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “This Court does not find any irregularity or illegality in the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority.” (at para n/a)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Rajasthan High Court judgment dated 15 May 2018 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“This Court does not find any irregularity or illegality in the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority.” (para n/a)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.