14 Nov 2014
Order issued
ConcludedThe Jharkhand High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: W.P.(S) No. 4675 of 2005
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2014-0034Dhanbad, JharkhandJudgment 14 November 2014
Barora Police Assistant Sub-Inspector vs State of Jharkhand and Others
The judgment of the Jharkhand High Court records the following account. replace victim name 'a minor' with role noun (e.g. 'a man'/'a boy'). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 14 November 2014 in W.P.(S) No. 4675 of 2005, the Jharkhand High Court (Coram: Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Assistant Sub-Inspector, Barora Police Station, Dhanbad.
- Register number
- JH 10 CW 0003
- Case reference
- W.P.(S) No. 4675 of 2005
- Court and date
- Jharkhand High Court (Coram: Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.), 14 November 2014
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Assistant Sub-Inspector, Barora Police Station, Dhanbad
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Not stated in the cited sources
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “The enquiry officer found the charges against the petitioner fully established on consideration of materials produced during the course of enquiry. Perusal of the enquiry report shows that the statement of the witness, officer in-charge and the Sanjeet Kumar Mishra, …” (at para 7)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Jharkhand High Court judgment dated 14 November 2014 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“The enquiry officer found the charges against the petitioner fully established on consideration of materials produced during the course of enquiry. Perusal of the enquiry report shows that the statement of the witness, officer in-charge and the Sanjeet Kumar Mishra, …” (para 7)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.