CW-2011-0033Jajpur, OdishaJudgment 19 July 2011

Barada Man vs State of Orissa and Others

The judgment of the Orissa High Court records the following account. A Barada man, aged 32, was arrested in an excise case on 29/30 September 2006, remanded to Jajpur Sub-Jail, and died on 3 October 2006 after admission to the district hospital; his widow alleged illegal detention and custodial torture, which the State denied. The court noted it was undisputed that he died in jail custody days after arrest, and that the State's counter said nothing on whether any medical test was conducted or the apex court's arrest guidelines were followed. Applying D.K. Basu custodial jurisprudence under Article 21, the court directed the State Government to pay Rs 1 lakh ex gratia to the bereaved family within two weeks, structured as fixed deposits for the widow, children and aged parents. It did not fix personal liability on any officer or order prosecution. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 19 July 2011 in W.P.(C) No. 17011 of 2006, the Orissa High Court (Coram: V. Gopala Gowda, B. N. Mahapatra, JJ.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Excise Inspector, Jajpur, Excise Department; Sub-Inspector of Police, Dharmasala Police Station, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 1 lakh (Rs 1,00,000).

Register number
OD 04 CW 0002
Case reference
W.P.(C) No. 17011 of 2006
Court and date
Orissa High Court (Coram: V. Gopala Gowda, B. N. Mahapatra, JJ.), 19 July 2011
Officer(s) at the material time
Excise Inspector, Jajpur, Excise Department; Sub-Inspector of Police, Dharmasala Police Station
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 47(a) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act; Article 21 of the Constitution of India; Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“In the facts situation, considering the age of the deceased and that he was the only bread winner of the bereaved family and died only after his arrest, we deem it just and proper to direct opposite party- State Government …” (at para 10)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 1 lakh (Rs 1,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Orissa High Court judgment dated 19 July 2011 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“In the facts situation, considering the age of the deceased and that he was the only bread winner of the bereaved family and died only after his arrest, we deem it just and proper to direct opposite party- State Government …” (para 10)

Institutional response

1
19 Jul 2011

Order issued

Concluded
Orissa High Court External · Binding

The Orissa High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 100,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: W.P.(C) No. 17011 of 2006
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.