The Punjab and Haryana High Court affirmed the conviction of Head Constable of Police Post Linepar, Bahadurgarh, for demanding Rs 1,000 from a Bahadurgarh man on 18 July 1994 to hush up a matter against his brother. A trap led by DSP Shri Singh with the SDM Rohtak as shadow witness on 19 July 1994 recovered tainted notes from his shirt pocket, corroborated by hand/pocket wash. The Court held demand and acceptance proved by cogent evidence but, given 17 years' pendency and the appellant's age of 73, reduced the sentence from two years' RI to one year's RI with the Rs 1,000 fine maintained. The appellant was ordered to surrender to serve the remaining sentence.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 30 August 2011 in Criminal Appeal No. 114-SB of 2000, the Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: L. N. Mittal, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Head Constable, Police Post Linepar, PS City Bahadurgarh.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment dated 30 August 2011 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“I find that the prosecution has led sufficient cogent and credible evidence to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly impugned judgment of conviction is affirmed.” (para 27)
The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.
