CW-2011-0013Darrang, AssamJudgment 29 July 2011

Mangaldoi Man vs State of Assam and Others

The Gauhati High Court awarded Rs 1,50,000 to the widow of rickshaw puller a Mangaldoi man, who died after a Mangaldoi police party led by SI apprehended him and his brother at Gariapara on 13 July 1999. The police claimed a mob had manhandled the alleged dacoits, but villagers deposed that the police beat them with rifle butts, branches and kicks, and the post-mortem recorded nine injuries including a fractured rib and blood-filled thoracic cavity. Accepting the magisterial enquiry's conclusion that police beating after apprehension could not be ruled out, the Court held that no clean chit could be given to the personnel and saddled the State with compensation. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 29 July 2011 in WP(C) No. 6426 of 2002, the Gauhati High Court (Coram: Madan B. Lokur, H. Baruah, JJ.) returned findings adverse to 4 police personnel, namely: Sub-Inspector, Mangaldoi PS, Darrang; Sub-Inspector, Mangaldoi PS, Darrang; Sub-Inspector, Mangaldoi PS, Darrang; Constable (No. 1345), Mangaldoi PS, Darrang, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 1.5 lakh (Rs 1,50,000).

Register number
AS 13 CW 0004
Case reference
WP(C) No. 6426 of 2002 / (2012) 1 GLD 58
Court and date
Gauhati High Court (Coram: Madan B. Lokur, H. Baruah, JJ.), 29 July 2011
Officer(s) at the material time
Sub-Inspector, Mangaldoi PS, Darrang; Sub-Inspector, Mangaldoi PS, Darrang; Sub-Inspector, Mangaldoi PS, Darrang; Constable (No. 1345), Mangaldoi PS, Darrang
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Not stated in the cited sources
Finding of the Court (extract)
“the police beating after their apprehension cannot be ruled out and for that no clean chit can be recorded in their favour.” (at para 15)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 1.5 lakh (Rs 1,50,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Gauhati High Court judgment dated 29 July 2011 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“the police beating after their apprehension cannot be ruled out and for that no clean chit can be recorded in their favour.” (para 15)

Institutional response

1
29 Jul 2011

Order issued

Concluded
Gauhati High Court External · Binding

The Gauhati High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 150,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: (2012) 1 GLD 58
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.