22 Nov 2010
Order issued
ConcludedThe Rajasthan High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: (2010) 11 RAJ CK 0135
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2010-0038Alwar, RajasthanJudgment 22 November 2010
Alwar Police Head Constable vs State of Rajasthan and Others
Head Constable was trapped on 07.10.1997 and convicted by the trial court under PC Act 1988 ss.13(1)(d)/13(2), sentenced to two years RI with Rs.5,000 fine; his criminal appeal (No.240/2001) remained pending with only the sentence suspended. After repeated suspension-reinstatement cycles the SP Alwar removed him on 08.03.2010 on the ground of conviction, and the Single Bench dismissed his writ on 19.04.2010. The Division Bench held the corruption conviction renders the appellant totally unfit to continue in service, the pending appeal was of no avail since the conviction was not stayed, and prior hearing would have been an empty formality. It held the removal appropriate and lawful and dismissed the special appeal.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 22 November 2010 in Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 328 of 2010, the Rajasthan High Court (Coram: Arun Mishra, Dalip Singh, JJ.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Head Constable, Alwar district police, Rajasthan.
- Register number
- RJ 02 CW 0003
- Case reference
- Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 328 of 2010 / (2010) 11 RAJ CK 0135
- Court and date
- Rajasthan High Court (Coram: Arun Mishra, Dalip Singh, JJ.), 22 November 2010
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Head Constable, Alwar district police, Rajasthan
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “The conviction in such a case renders the Appellant totally unfit to continue in service.” (at para 8)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Rajasthan High Court judgment dated 22 November 2010 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“The conviction in such a case renders the Appellant totally unfit to continue in service.” (para 8)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.