CW-2010-0008Madurai, Tamil NaduJudgment 6 August 2010

Madurai Man v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.

The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) allowed Sangaiyya's writ for his 26-year-old son's custodial death at Keeraithurai police station in December 2004 after being picked up for drinking near a liquor shop. The Court awarded Rs 5 lakh to the legal heirs, structured as Rs 1 lakh each to the father and widow and Rs 3 lakh in fixed deposit for the minor children. It noted the Government had already ordered prosecution and departmental action against the responsible personnel. Recovery of the compensation from their salaries was directed. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 6 August 2010 in W.P.(MD) No. 5272 of 2006, the Madras High Court (Coram: S. Manikumar, J.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Police Constable, Keeraithurai PS, Madurai; Police Constable, Keeraithurai PS, Madurai, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 5 lakh (Rs 5,00,000).

Register number
TN 57 CW 0005
Case reference
W.P.(MD) No. 5272 of 2006
Court and date
Madras High Court (Coram: S. Manikumar, J.), 6 August 2010
Officer(s) at the material time
Police Constable, Keeraithurai PS, Madurai; Police Constable, Keeraithurai PS, Madurai
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The said amount is further directed to be recovered from the salary of the police personnel, who were prima facie found by the government to be responsible for the death.” (at para 45)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 5 lakh (Rs 5,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Madras High Court judgment dated 6 August 2010 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“The said amount is further directed to be recovered from the salary of the police personnel, who were prima facie found by the government to be responsible for the death.” (para 45)

Institutional response

1
6 Aug 2010

Order issued

Concluded
Madras High Court External · Binding

The Madras High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 500,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: W.P.(MD) No. 5272 of 2006
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.