6 Aug 2010
Order issued
ConcludedThe Uttarakhand High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: (2010) 08 UK CK 0096
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2010-0007Champawat, UttarakhandJudgment 6 August 2010
Het Ram Puri v. State of Uttaranchal
The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed Constable Het Ram Puri's writ petition, upholding his dismissal on 7 December 2000 and the appellate order of June 2002. The Court recorded that after transfer from Moradabad to Champawat in June 1999 with directions to join by 15 July 1999, he never joined and did not participate in the disciplinary proceedings despite notices affixed at his Bareilly home. It rejected his tuberculosis plea for want of a medical certificate or hospital admission, and his argument that leave-without-pay condoned the absence. The Court held the police is a disciplined force and the absence could not be condoned. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 6 August 2010 in Writ Petition against SP Champawat order dated 07.12.2000 and DIG Kumaon order dated 27.06.2002, the Uttarakhand High Court (Coram: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Het Ram Puri (Constable).
- Register number
- UK 03 CW 0001
- Case reference
- Writ Petition against SP Champawat order dated 07.12.2000 and DIG Kumaon order dated 27.06.2002 / (2010) 08 UK CK 0096
- Court and date
- Uttarakhand High Court (Coram: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.), 6 August 2010
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Het Ram Puri (Constable)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Not stated in the cited sources
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “This Court, therefore, finds no merit in the present Writ Petition and the same is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed.” (at para 5)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Uttarakhand High Court judgment dated 6 August 2010 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“This Court, therefore, finds no merit in the present Writ Petition and the same is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed.” (para 5)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.