Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Uttarakhand High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: (2009) NCC 808; (2009) 07 UK CK 0062
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2009-0007Udham Singh Nagar, UttarakhandJudgment 28 July 2009
Constable Harish Chand Pandey vs The State
Replace closing boilerplate to note the appellant's recorded defence (s.313 admissions/denials; pleas of poor light, no motive and drunkenness for s.304 Part I, all rejected at paras 11-13). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 28 July 2009 in Criminal Appeal No. 481 of 2001, the Uttarakhand High Court (Coram: Prafulla C. Pant, Brahma Singh Verma, JJ.) affirmed the conviction of the Harish Chand Pandey (Constable).
- Register number
- UK 06 CW 0002
- Case reference
- Criminal Appeal No. 481 of 2001 / (2009) NCC 808; (2009) 07 UK CK 0062
- Court and date
- Uttarakhand High Court (Coram: Prafulla C. Pant, Brahma Singh Verma, JJ.), 28 July 2009
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Harish Chand Pandey (Constable)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “From the above oral evidence on record, as discussed above, read with the autopsy report (Ext. A -5) and the report of the Forensic Expert (Ext. A -16) in which it is mentioned that after examination it was found that …” (at para 10)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Uttarakhand High Court judgment dated 28 July 2009 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“From the above oral evidence on record, as discussed above, read with the autopsy report (Ext. A -5) and the report of the Forensic Expert (Ext. A -16) in which it is mentioned that after examination it was found that …” (para 10)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
28 Jul 2009
Order issued
ConcludedThe Uttarakhand High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: (2009) NCC 808; (2009) 07 UK CK 0062
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.