Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Uttarakhand High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: (2008) CriLJ 4163
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2008-0009Nainital, UttarakhandJudgment 2 June 2008
Ishwari Ram vs State of U.P.
Replace closing boilerplate to note the appellant's recorded defence (denial; motive/contradiction pleas at paras 10-13, rejected). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 2 June 2008 in Criminal Appeal No. 265 of 2001, the Uttarakhand High Court (Coram: Prafulla C. Pant, Dharam Veer, JJ.) affirmed the conviction of the Ishwari Ram (Constable (No. 438, Armed Police)).
- Register number
- UK 04 CW 0002
- Case reference
- Criminal Appeal No. 265 of 2001 / (2008) CriLJ 4163
- Court and date
- Uttarakhand High Court (Coram: Prafulla C. Pant, Dharam Veer, JJ.), 2 June 2008
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Ishwari Ram (Constable (No. 438, Armed Police))
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “For the reasons, as discussed above, we do not find any error of law or that of the fact committed by the trial Court in convicting the accused under Sections 302 and 307, I.P.C. We concur with the conviction recorded …” (at para 14-15)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Uttarakhand High Court judgment dated 2 June 2008 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“For the reasons, as discussed above, we do not find any error of law or that of the fact committed by the trial Court in convicting the accused under Sections 302 and 307, I.P.C. We concur with the conviction recorded …” (para 14-15)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
2 Jun 2008
Order issued
ConcludedThe Uttarakhand High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: (2008) CriLJ 4163
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.