CW-2007-0028Bhavnagar, GujaratJudgment 24 August 2007

Bhavnagar Police Police Sub-Inspector and others vs State of Gujarat

The judgment of the Gujarat High Court records the following account. PSI of Khuntvada Police Station stopped luxury bus GTS-9919 carrying a marriage party at Aasarana Chokadi on 12 December 1990, seized its permit papers and demanded Rs.250 (later Rs.225) as 'entry fee'. The bus owner refused to pay and approached the ACB, Bhavnagar, whose trap caught the PSI accepting the marked amount. The Special Judge, Bhavnagar convicted him in 1993 while acquitting three co-accused. The Gujarat High Court held the prosecution evidence acceptable and reliable, rejected the defence of a false trap, and confirmed the conviction and sentence while cancelling bail and ordering surrender. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 24 August 2007 in Criminal Appeal No. 1289 of 1993, the Gujarat High Court (Coram: M.D. Shah, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Police Sub-Inspector, Khuntvada Police Station.

Register number
GJ 04 CW 0002
Case reference
Criminal Appeal No. 1289 of 1993 / 2008 Cri LJ 505, (2008) 2 GLR 1075
Court and date
Gujarat High Court (Coram: M.D. Shah, J.), 24 August 2007
Officer(s) at the material time
Police Sub-Inspector, Khuntvada Police Station
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act
Finding of the Court (extract)
“For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is meritless and deserves to be dismissed. This appeal is accordingly dismissed and the judgment and order of conviction and sentence recorded in Special Case No. 9 of 1991 dated 5-11-1993 by the learned …” (at para para 18)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 1 year.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Gujarat High Court judgment dated 24 August 2007 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is meritless and deserves to be dismissed. This appeal is accordingly dismissed and the judgment and order of conviction and sentence recorded in Special Case No. 9 of 1991 dated 5-11-1993 by the learned …” (para para 18)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Gujarat High Court judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Gujarat High Court judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: 2008 Cri LJ 505, (2008) 2 GLR 1075
Not yet re-checked.
24 Aug 2007

Order issued

Concluded
Gujarat High Court External · Binding

The Gujarat High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: 2008 Cri LJ 505, (2008) 2 GLR 1075
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.