The Jharkhand High Court (M.Y. Eqbal J.) on 14 November 2006 dismissed the appeals of CISF constables and Naik of the Kargali colliery check post against their dismissal from service. The court recorded that surprise checks on 21 and 24 November 1997 found them collecting Rs. 50 and Rs. 65 respectively as illegal gratification from unidentified truck drivers and khalasis, for which they were charge-sheeted for gross misconduct, indiscipline and dereliction of duty and dismissed after a departmental inquiry. The court agreed with the Single Judge that the small sums recovered did not make the proved allegations any less grave for CISF constables, and that courts must not lightly interfere with punishments imposed after a properly conducted enquiry in disciplined services. It held the penalty of dismissal commensurate with the charges and dismissed both appeals, so the dismissals stand.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 14 November 2006 in LPAs against CWJC Nos. 1707 and 1715 of 1998 (LPA numbers not stated in judgment text), the Jharkhand High Court (Coram: M.Y. Eqbal, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against 2 police personnel, namely: Constable, CISF, Kargali colliery; Naik, CISF, Kargali colliery.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
The Jharkhand High Court judgment dated 14 November 2006 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“Admittedly the appellants are constables in CISF and they were duty bound to maintain honesty and integrity in the discharge of their duty. The charge against the appellants regarding collecting money at the Check Post has been sufficiently proved.” (para 5)
The Jharkhand High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.
