CW-2005-0018North Delhi, DelhiJudgment 28 September 2005

Delhi Man vs State and Others

A Delhi man alleged he was picked up on 3.10.2004 by two PS Bara Hindu Rao officials and mercilessly beaten and tortured in custody, despite an earlier High Court protection order against police harassment. The status report showed he was arrested by SI under Sections 107/151 CrPC without sufficient reasons, was not medically examined on lock-up entry, and the Body Inspection Memo showed no injury while the hospital MLC recorded beating in police custody with bruises, contusion and swelling. The Court held a prima facie case of police brutality and custodial torture was made out. It directed registration of an FIR to be investigated by the District Investigating Unit (North) and Rs 50,000 ex gratia ad interim compensation recoverable from the delinquent policeman, expressly without prejudice to the merits. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 28 September 2005 in W.P.(Crl.) No. 305 of 2005, the Delhi High Court (Coram: R. S. Sodhi, J.) returned findings adverse to the Sub-Inspector, PS Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi Police, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 50,000.

Register number
DL 01 CW 0001
Case reference
W.P.(Crl.) No. 305 of 2005 / (2005) 09 DEL CK 0108
Court and date
Delhi High Court (Coram: R. S. Sodhi, J.), 28 September 2005
Officer(s) at the material time
Sub-Inspector, PS Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi Police
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Section 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Finding of the Court (extract)
“In that view of the matter, I direct that an FIR be registered and investigation be carried out by the District Investigating Unit (North) and since, prima facie, a case of police brutality and custodial torture is made out, I …” (at para 11)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 50,000.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Delhi High Court judgment dated 28 September 2005 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial torturePrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“In that view of the matter, I direct that an FIR be registered and investigation be carried out by the District Investigating Unit (North) and since, prima facie, a case of police brutality and custodial torture is made out, I …” (para 11)

Institutional response

1
28 Sep 2005

Order issued

Concluded
Delhi High Court External · Binding

The Delhi High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 50,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: (2005) 09 DEL CK 0108
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.