25 Jul 2005
Order issued
ConcludedThe Jharkhand High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: [2005(3) JCR 381 (JHR)]; 2005 AIR Jhar HCR 2426; (2005) 3 JLJR 697
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2005-0015JharkhandJudgment 25 July 2005
CISF Constable vs Union of India and Others
The Jharkhand High Court (M.Y. Eqbal J.) on 25 July 2005 dismissed the writ petition of CISF constable (No. 8017761) against the rejection of his revision by the Inspector General, CISF Eastern Sector. The court recorded the same history as the later appeal round: dozing on watch-tower duty on 11/12 February 1992 and assaulting Inspector, both charges proved, dismissal on 12 October 1992, and the Division Bench in LPA No. 646 of 2002 restoring dismissal while allowing a revision on quantum only. The court held that dismissal on proved misconduct cannot be interfered with on sympathetic grounds unless illogical, procedurally improper or shocking to conscience. Declining to interfere, it dismissed the writ petition; a further appeal in the same matter was dismissed on 8 March 2006 (recorded as CWC-0993).
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 25 July 2005 in Writ petition against IG CISF (Eastern Sector) revision order (number not stated in judgment text), the Jharkhand High Court (Coram: M.Y. Eqbal, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Constable, CISF.
- Register number
- JH 00 CW 0002
- Case reference
- Writ petition against IG CISF (Eastern Sector) revision order (number not stated in judgment text) / [2005(3) JCR 381 (JHR)]; 2005 AIR Jhar HCR 2426; (2005) 3 JLJR 697
- Court and date
- Jharkhand High Court (Coram: M.Y. Eqbal, J.), 25 July 2005
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable, CISF
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 18 of the CISF Act, 1968
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “I am not inclined to interfere with the order of punishment imposed upon the petitioner.” (at para 8)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Jharkhand High Court judgment dated 25 July 2005 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“I am not inclined to interfere with the order of punishment imposed upon the petitioner.” (para 8)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.