17 May 2005
Order issued
ConcludedThe Delhi High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: (2005) 05 DEL CK 0262
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2005-0012DelhiJudgment 17 May 2005
Delhi Police Constable (Executive) and others vs NCT of Delhi and Others
Constable (Executive) [name withheld] was dismissed on 10.11.2001 after departmental proceedings found he had secured enrolment in the Delhi Police with forged high-school and intermediate certificates showing date of birth 02.01.1971, though Board records and his genuine character certificate showed 01.04.1969, and had withdrawn the originals from his character roll in 1995 on a false pretext. His departmental appeal and CAT Original Application were dismissed. The Court held the forgery proved by Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad documentary evidence, rejected procedural challenges on non-supply of documents and non-examination of witnesses, and found no infirmity in the Tribunal order. The writ petition was dismissed and the dismissal from service stands. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 17 May 2005 in W.P.(C) No. 3494 of 2005, the Delhi High Court (Coram: Mukundakam Sharma, Rekha Sharma, JJ.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Constable (Executive), Delhi Police.
- Register number
- DL 00 CW 0015
- Case reference
- W.P.(C) No. 3494 of 2005 / (2005) 05 DEL CK 0262
- Court and date
- Delhi High Court (Coram: Mukundakam Sharma, Rekha Sharma, JJ.), 17 May 2005
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable (Executive), Delhi Police
- Present service status
- Recorded in the cited sources as dismissed from service.
- Provisions invoked
- Not stated in the cited sources
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “We find no infirmity in the order passed by the Tribunal. Accordingly the petition is dismissed.” (at para 8)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Delhi High Court judgment dated 17 May 2005 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“We find no infirmity in the order passed by the Tribunal. Accordingly the petition is dismissed.” (para 8)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.