CW-2004-0002Jalandhar, PunjabJudgment 29 May 2004

Jalandhar Man vs State of Punjab and Others

Add the recorded State side: respondents admitted the death and FIR 5/2003 s.304-A against nine jail + two police officials (para 3); State counsel contended it was an emergency, no negligence, no liability (para 6). Drop the false 'police version is not recorded' sentence.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 29 May 2004 in Civil Writ Petition No. 550 of 2004, the Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: Binod Kumar Roy, Surya Kant, JJ.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Assistant Sub-Inspector, Punjab Police, Jalandhar; Head Constable, Punjab Police, Jalandhar, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 2.5 lakh (Rs 2,50,000).

Register number
PB 08 CW 0002
Case reference
Civil Writ Petition No. 550 of 2004 / (2004) 05 P&H CK 0097
Court and date
Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: Binod Kumar Roy, Surya Kant, JJ.), 29 May 2004
Officer(s) at the material time
Assistant Sub-Inspector, Punjab Police, Jalandhar; Head Constable, Punjab Police, Jalandhar
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“at least on account of gross negligence committed by the officials of the Jail and Police Departments of the State of Punjab, if not killed by one of them by administering poison, we are of the view that the ends …” (at para 13)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 2.5 lakh (Rs 2,50,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment dated 29 May 2004 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“at least on account of gross negligence committed by the officials of the Jail and Police Departments of the State of Punjab, if not killed by one of them by administering poison, we are of the view that the ends …” (para 13)

Institutional response

1
29 May 2004

Order issued

Concluded
Punjab and Haryana High Court External · Binding

The Punjab and Haryana High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 250,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: (2004) 05 P&H CK 0097
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.