5 Mar 2003
Order issued
ConcludedThe Patna High Court entered convictions against police personnel in this judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: (2003) 03 PAT CK 0015
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2003-0014Rohtas, BiharJudgment 5 March 2003
In Re: Superintendent of Police and Others (Sasaram court incident dated 19.01.2002)
The judgment of the Patna High Court records the following account. Delete tore-the-uniform-of-a Sasaram man clause. Correct final sentence to: Twelve other officers were exonerated (para 34) along with the SP (paras 16-19). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 5 March 2003 in C.W.J.C. No. 1220 of 2002, the Patna High Court (Coram: S. N. Jha, Narayan Roy, R. S. Garg, JJ.) recorded the conviction of 4 police personnel, namely: Sub-Inspector, Rohtas Police, Bihar; Sub-Inspector, Rohtas Police, Bihar; Sub-Inspector, Bikramganj Police Station, Rohtas; Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sasaram, Rohtas.
- Register number
- BR 24 CW 0002
- Case reference
- C.W.J.C. No. 1220 of 2002 / (2003) 03 PAT CK 0015
- Court and date
- Patna High Court (Coram: S. N. Jha, Narayan Roy, R. S. Garg, JJ.), 5 March 2003
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Sub-Inspector, Rohtas Police, Bihar; Sub-Inspector, Rohtas Police, Bihar; Sub-Inspector, Bikramganj Police Station, Rohtas; Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sasaram, Rohtas
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Section 349 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “I would accordingly hold that SI [name withheld] too guilty of contempt.” (at para 27)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction entered by High Court. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 0.167 years.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Patna High Court judgment dated 5 March 2003 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“I would accordingly hold that SI [name withheld] too guilty of contempt.” (para 27)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.