CW-2002-0030Barabanki, Uttar PradeshJudgment 26 August 2002

Fatehpur Police Constable v. State of U.P.

The Allahabad High Court (single Judge, 26-8-2002) dismissed the appeal of Police Constable of Police Station Fatehpur, Barabanki, and upheld his six-year rigorous imprisonment conviction under section 376 IPC imposed by the Sessions Judge on 11-3-1987. The court found that on 9-5-1985, inside police station premises, the appellant took the infant daughter of a Sub-Inspector family into his quarter and raped her, crediting the eyewitness account of the mother and the independent witness [name withheld]. The court held the medical evidence proved rape of a girl aged less than one year beyond doubt and found no illegality in the trial court order. It cancelled bail, discharged sureties, and directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barabanki, to arrest the appellant to serve the sentence. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 26 August 2002 in Criminal Appeal No. 213 of 1987 (S.T. No. 306 of 1985), the Allahabad High Court (Coram: M.A. Khan, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Constable, Police Station Fatehpur, Barabanki.

Register number
UP 41 CW 0001
Case reference
Criminal Appeal No. 213 of 1987 (S.T. No. 306 of 1985) / (2003) CriLJ 2056
Court and date
Allahabad High Court (Coram: M.A. Khan, J.), 26 August 2002
Officer(s) at the material time
Constable, Police Station Fatehpur, Barabanki
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The statement of Medical Officer proves beyond doubt that the girl who was less than one year, was subjected to rape by the appellant. There is absolutely no reason to discard the prosecution case and the learned Court below was …” (at para 8)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment; maximum substantive term of 6 years.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Allahabad High Court judgment dated 26 August 2002 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“The statement of Medical Officer proves beyond doubt that the girl who was less than one year, was subjected to rape by the appellant. There is absolutely no reason to discard the prosecution case and the learned Court below was …” (para 8)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Allahabad High Court judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Allahabad High Court judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: (2003) CriLJ 2056
Not yet re-checked.
26 Aug 2002

Order issued

Concluded
Allahabad High Court External · Binding

The Allahabad High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: (2003) CriLJ 2056
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.