CW-2002-0014Siddharthnagar, Uttar PradeshJudgment 19 July 2002

Golhaura Man and Others vs State of U.P. and Others

The judgment of the Allahabad High Court records the following account. A Golhaura man, aged 27, was arrested on 14 October 1998 in a kidnapping case and kept in the Golhaura police lock-up for three days, where the family alleged he was beaten to death. Police claimed he hanged himself, obtained a post-mortem report of hanging and cremated the body; an FIR for murder was later registered against police personnel on a Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. direction. The Division Bench rejected the suicide plea as too big a pill to be swallowed, held the police officers and the autopsy doctor acted hand in glove to fabricate the post-mortem report, and found D.K. Basu safeguards violated. It allowed the writ petition, directed Rs. 2,50,000 compensation (Rs. 1,50,000 to parents, Rs. 1,00,000 to the widow) recoverable from the responsible police officers, and left criminal liability to the pending CBCID murder investigation.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 19 July 2002 in Criminal M.W.P. No. 1754 of 1999, the Allahabad High Court (Coram: S.R. Singh, R.K. Dash, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the Constables and officers on lock-up duty, Golhaura Police Station, Siddharthnagar, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 2.5 lakh (Rs 2,50,000).

Register number
UP 55 CW 0001
Case reference
Criminal M.W.P. No. 1754 of 1999 / (2002) 07 AHC CK 0152; 2002 CriLJ 4546
Court and date
Allahabad High Court (Coram: S.R. Singh, R.K. Dash, JJ.), 19 July 2002
Officer(s) at the material time
Constables and officers on lock-up duty, Golhaura Police Station, Siddharthnagar
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 384 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The aforesaid amount may be recovered by the State from the concerned police officers responsible for the death of the deceased in the police lock-up.” (at para 16)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 2.5 lakh (Rs 2,50,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Allahabad High Court judgment dated 19 July 2002 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“The aforesaid amount may be recovered by the State from the concerned police officers responsible for the death of the deceased in the police lock-up.” (para 16)

Institutional response

1
19 Jul 2002

Order issued

Concluded
Allahabad High Court External · Binding

The Allahabad High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 250,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: (2002) 07 AHC CK 0152; 2002 CriLJ 4546
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.