CW-2002-0002Krishnagiri, Tamil NaduJudgment 21 June 2002

Govindan @ Govindarajan, Selvaraj & Ors. v. State rep. by R.D.O., Hosur (K. S. gang-rape case)

The Madras High Court confirmed the convictions of the Inspector, Head Constable, Writer and Constable of Thalli PS who, in uniform and on duty, gang-raped teacher the complainant in the station store-room on 20 July 1988, beat her, dumped her in a pit and stoned her. The Court held even the 10-year minimum was insufficient for uniformed custodial gang rape and enhanced the Section 376 sentence to life imprisonment on the victim's revision. It directed the Home Secretary to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation within three months and ordered the appellants to surrender. Identification parade, bloodstains and medical evidence were held to corroborate the victim. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 21 June 2002 in Crl.A. Nos. 764 and 765 of 1993 with Crl.R.C. No. 172 of 1994, the Madras High Court (Coram: M. Karpagavinayagam, J.) affirmed the conviction of 4 police personnel, namely: Balasubramanian (Inspector of Police); Govindarajan (Head Constable); Selvaraj (Writer); Govindasamy (Constable), and directed payment of compensation of Rs 5 lakh (Rs 5,00,000).

Register number
TN 24 CW 0002
Case reference
Crl.A. Nos. 764 and 765 of 1993 with Crl.R.C. No. 172 of 1994
Court and date
Madras High Court (Coram: M. Karpagavinayagam, J.), 21 June 2002
Officer(s) at the material time
Balasubramanian (Inspector of Police); Govindarajan (Head Constable); Selvaraj (Writer); Govindasamy (Constable)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The uniformity in the sad episode is that while they committed gang rape inside the police station, they were in uniform and on duty.” (at para 3)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine. Compensation: Rs 5 lakh (Rs 5,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Madras High Court judgment dated 21 June 2002 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial torturePrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“The uniformity in the sad episode is that while they committed gang rape inside the police station, they were in uniform and on duty.” (para 3)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Madras High Court judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Madras High Court judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: Crl.A. Nos. 764 and 765 of 1993 with Crl.R.C. No. 172 of 1994
Not yet re-checked.
21 Jun 2002

Order issued

Concluded
Madras High Court External · Binding

The Madras High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: Crl.A. Nos. 764 and 765 of 1993 with Crl.R.C. No. 172 of 1994
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.