CW-2002-0001Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, MaharashtraJudgment 13 February 2002

Aurangabad Man v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) held that an Aurangabad man, arrested on 30-10-1994 and found dead in the Kranti Chowk lock-up on the night of 8/9 November 1994 after about ten days in custody, died a homicidal custodial death following torture. The court rejected the police suicide-by-hanging story as physically impossible and a concocted cover-up, distrusted the CID inquiry as disguising police sins, and called the inquest dishonest. Holding the State liable in public law, it awarded Rs 2 lakh compensation (Rs 50,000 cash to the widow, Rs 1.5 lakh in fixed deposit for the children) plus Rs 5,000 costs. It further directed the CBI to register a case, investigate and prosecute those responsible, and ordered disciplinary proceedings against them. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 13 February 2002, the Bombay High Court (Coram: S.S. Parkar, D.S. Zoting, JJ.) returned findings adverse to 3 police personnel, namely: Police Sub-Inspector, Special Squad, Aurangabad City police; Head Constable, Kranti Chowk Police Station, Aurangabad; Police personnel, Kranti Chowk / City Chowk / Osmanpura Police Stations, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).

Register number
MH 20 CW 0001
Case reference
2003(2) Bom CR 215; 2002(4) Mh LJ 37
Court and date
Bombay High Court (Coram: S.S. Parkar, D.S. Zoting, JJ.), 13 February 2002
Officer(s) at the material time
Police Sub-Inspector, Special Squad, Aurangabad City police; Head Constable, Kranti Chowk Police Station, Aurangabad; Police personnel, Kranti Chowk / City Chowk / Osmanpura Police Stations
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 21 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“This is especially so when we are not in doubt that from the facts and circumstances of the case and the false story attempted to be put up by the police, the police alone are responsible for the death of …” (at para 24)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Bombay High Court judgment dated 13 February 2002 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“This is especially so when we are not in doubt that from the facts and circumstances of the case and the false story attempted to be put up by the police, the police alone are responsible for the death of …” (para 24)

Institutional response

1
13 Feb 2002

Order issued

Concluded
Bombay High Court External · Binding

The Bombay High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 200,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: 2003(2) Bom CR 215; 2002(4) Mh LJ 37
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.