CW-2000-0001North West Delhi, DelhiJudgment 4 February 2000

Phoolwati @ Phullo vs National Capital Territory of Delhi

The Delhi High Court awarded Rs 3 lakh for the custodial death of a Siraspur man at PS Samaypur Badli. On 2 December 1992 a seven-man police party led by SI came looking for the victim's cousins, beat a Siraspur man with lathis at his Siraspur home and again at the police station; he died the next evening in custody at Hindu Rao Hospital of haemorrhagic shock from a fractured femur and multiple injuries. The SDM's Section 176 inquest held the death resulted from police beating, and the CBI chargesheeted seven policemen plus three private persons. The State offered no explanation for the injuries, and the Court held it vicariously liable under Article 21. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 4 February 2000, the Delhi High Court (Coram: Anil Dev Singh, J.) returned findings adverse to 4 police personnel, namely: Sub-Inspector, Police Station Samaypur Badli, Delhi Police; Sub-Inspector, Police Station Samaypur Badli, Delhi Police; SHO, Police Station Samaypur Badli, Delhi Police; Police personnel, Police Station Samaypur Badli, Delhi Police, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 3 lakh (Rs 3,00,000).

Register number
DL 08 CW 0002
Case reference
2000 II AD (Delhi) 537; 2000 CriLJ 1613; 84 (2000) DLT 177
Court and date
Delhi High Court (Coram: Anil Dev Singh, J.), 4 February 2000
Officer(s) at the material time
Sub-Inspector, Police Station Samaypur Badli, Delhi Police; Sub-Inspector, Police Station Samaypur Badli, Delhi Police; SHO, Police Station Samaypur Badli, Delhi Police; Police personnel, Police Station Samaypur Badli, Delhi Police
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 226 of the Constitution of India; Article 21 of the Constitution of India; Section 176 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Finding of the Court (extract)
“From the perusal of the report of the S.D.M. it cannot be denied that the a Siraspur man died in police custody as a result of beating given by the police personnel.” (at para 6)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 3 lakh (Rs 3,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Delhi High Court judgment dated 4 February 2000 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“From the perusal of the report of the S.D.M. it cannot be denied that the a Siraspur man died in police custody as a result of beating given by the police personnel.” (para 6)

Institutional response

1
4 Feb 2000

Order issued

Concluded
Delhi High Court External · Binding

The Delhi High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 300,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: 2000 II AD (Delhi) 537; 2000 CriLJ 1613; 84 (2000) DLT 177
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.