CW-1999-0013Palamu, JharkhandJudgment 11 November 1999

Palamu Man v. Union of India and Others

The Patna High Court (Ranchi bench) allowed the widow's writ, holding that her husband [name withheld] died in custody on 18 July 1998 from a brutal assault by a police party led by DySP [name withheld]. The court found that the joint Bihar police-BMP-CRPF party had raided the house without warrant, beaten the deceased with dandas and rifle butts, and failed to follow the D.K. Basu safeguards, rejecting the police claim that he was a wanted MCC activist injured while fleeing. It directed the CBI to hold a thorough enquiry and institute criminal prosecution against the officers involved in causing the death by torture. The court ordered Rs 2 lakh compensation to the widow, to be paid equally by the Central and State Governments within two months. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 11 November 1999 in C.W.J.C. No. 2437 of 1998 (R), the Patna High Court (Coram: M.Y. Eqbal, J.) returned findings adverse to 4 police personnel, namely: Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sadar B Circle, Daltonganj, Bihar Police; Inspector, Bihar Police (Panki P.S.); Sub-Inspector, Bihar Police (Panki P.S.); Police personnel, CRPF personnel with Assistant Commandant (raid party), and directed payment of compensation of Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).

Register number
JH 03 CW 0001
Case reference
C.W.J.C. No. 2437 of 1998 (R) / (2000) 1 PLJR 672
Court and date
Patna High Court (Coram: M.Y. Eqbal, J.), 11 November 1999
Officer(s) at the material time
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sadar B Circle, Daltonganj, Bihar Police; Inspector, Bihar Police (Panki P.S.); Sub-Inspector, Bihar Police (Panki P.S.); Police personnel, CRPF personnel with Assistant Commandant (raid party)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 21 of the Constitution of India; Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India; Section 220 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 330 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 331 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Section 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Finding of the Court (extract)
“It is prima facie evident that the brutal and inhuman act of the police personnels has resulted in the death of the deceased.” (at para 13)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Patna High Court judgment dated 11 November 1999 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“It is prima facie evident that the brutal and inhuman act of the police personnels has resulted in the death of the deceased.” (para 13)

Institutional response

1
11 Nov 1999

Order issued

Concluded
Patna High Court External · Binding

The Patna High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 200,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: (2000) 1 PLJR 672
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.